<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: MySpace Age and Gender Demographics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/</link>
	<description>Information for a digital world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 31 Dec 2010 20:44:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-3286</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 16:19:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/#comment-3286</guid>
		<description>I can explain the age bubble: many girls use wildly inflated numbers to avoid turning up in searches by guys on the prowl.  Im a photographer and have noticed that many of the girls I&#039;ve shot who have myspace pages list their ages as 71 or 99, for instance.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can explain the age bubble: many girls use wildly inflated numbers to avoid turning up in searches by guys on the prowl.  Im a photographer and have noticed that many of the girls I&#8217;ve shot who have myspace pages list their ages as 71 or 99, for instance.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: schlimmbesserung</title>
		<link>http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-2500</link>
		<dc:creator>schlimmbesserung</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2007 19:12:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/#comment-2500</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m searching out MySpace demographics for work, which is how I ended up here so many months after the fact.  The answer to the pocket at 70 is even more childish than 99.  They&#039;re not clustered around 70; they&#039;re clustered around 69.

I would also add that 99 is not necessarily to be funny; it&#039;s because users can browse other users by age, body type, etc.  I would bet 99 and &quot;More to love&quot; as body type have a high coincidence.  People don&#039;t want to be sought out by random strangers who think they&#039;re good looking, so they choose the max age in hopes nobody will include that in their search parameters.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m searching out MySpace demographics for work, which is how I ended up here so many months after the fact.  The answer to the pocket at 70 is even more childish than 99.  They&#8217;re not clustered around 70; they&#8217;re clustered around 69.</p>
<p>I would also add that 99 is not necessarily to be funny; it&#8217;s because users can browse other users by age, body type, etc.  I would bet 99 and &#8220;More to love&#8221; as body type have a high coincidence.  People don&#8217;t want to be sought out by random strangers who think they&#8217;re good looking, so they choose the max age in hopes nobody will include that in their search parameters.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robert</title>
		<link>http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-2220</link>
		<dc:creator>Robert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jul 2007 16:19:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/#comment-2220</guid>
		<description>Thanks Kevin. That makes sense. I didn&#039;t think there were a bunch of tech savvy centenarians on MySpace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks Kevin. That makes sense. I didn&#8217;t think there were a bunch of tech savvy centenarians on MySpace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin Doyle</title>
		<link>http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/comment-page-1/#comment-2215</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin Doyle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2007 22:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.rl-digital.com/2007/myspace-demographics/#comment-2215</guid>
		<description>I cannot explain the bubble of users at 70 but the one at 100 is easily explainable. 

The oldest age you can enter is 99 and some people find it ammusing to enter that as their age when it clearly is not.  Don&#039;t ask me why, but thats your reason.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I cannot explain the bubble of users at 70 but the one at 100 is easily explainable. </p>
<p>The oldest age you can enter is 99 and some people find it ammusing to enter that as their age when it clearly is not.  Don&#8217;t ask me why, but thats your reason.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk (enhanced)
Database Caching using disk
Object Caching 602/629 objects using disk

Served from: www.rl-digital.com @ 2012-02-07 21:26:23 -->
